Effects of a combined exercise and dietary intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer : the Physical Activity and Dietary intervention in OVArian cancer (PADOVA) randomized controlled trial

Samenvatting

Objective Chemotherapy treatment modifications can impact survival in patients with ovarian cancer, particularly when the relative dose intensity falls below 85%. Exercise and dietary interventions may benefit treatment tolerability. This study aimed to explore the effects of a combined exercise and dietary intervention on secondary outcomes of the Physical Activity and Dietary intervention in OVArian cancer (PADOVA) trial, specifically relative dose intensity and progression-free survival. Methods 81 patients with ovarian cancer were randomized into a combined supervised exercise and dietary intervention during (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy or a usual care control group. Relative dose intensity was calculated as the ratio of delivered dose intensity (dose per actual time) to the standard dose for six chemotherapy cycles. The effect on relative dose intensity was analyzed using logistic regression and Bayesian posterior probability of correctly identifying the best study arm. The effect on progression-free survival was examined using Cox regression. Results The proportion of patients achieving a relative dose intensity ≥85% was 74.4% in the intervention group compared with 61.5% in the control group (OR 2.04, 95% CI 0.75 to 5.84). The Bayesian posterior probability that the intervention group had a higher proportion of patients with a relative dose intensity ≥85% was 88.4%. Intervention effect on progression-free survival was not statistically significant (HR 1.63, 95% CI 0.82 to 3.23). At 18 months, the proportion of patients without disease progression was 73% in the intervention group and 51% in the control group. Conclusion The proportions of patients with ovarian cancer with a relative dose intensity ≥85% and an 18-month progression-free survival were numerically higher in the intervention group compared with the control group, but these differences were not statistically significant. The higher proportions and the 88.4% probability that intervention is superior to usual care for clinical outcomes support future studies on exercise and dietary interventions with a focus on clinical outcomes as primary endpoints.