New SPRINT report and factsheet: Exploring the lock-ins and barriers surrounding a transition away from synthetic pesticide reliance

SPRINT has just published a report and factsheet,which explore the lock-ins and barriers surrounding a transition away from reliance on synthetic pesticides.

Report: Pesticide lock-in and barriers to transition towards sustainable plant protection, this report was written by SPRINT partners across the EU, include our colleague at SLM our colleague dr. Paula Harkes.

In this report, SPRINT researchers draw on mixed qualitative methods to explore the different dimensions of the pesticide lock-in situation, they identified the key lock-in mechanisms and barriers corresponding to the following dimensions:

1) agronomy & research; 2) economics; 3) knowledge; 4) policy; 5) regulation, and 6) cognitive dimensions.

In the next steps of the SPRINT project, we will explore together with take holders what kind of possibilities and opportunities there are for breaking the pesticide lock-in situation, by identifying different transition pathways to better support the emergence and diffusion of alternatives to synthetic pesticides.

Factsheet: Lock-ins and Barriers Surrounding a Transition away From Reliance on Syntetic Pesticides.

This factsheet provides an overview of the key lock-ins and barriers identified as affecting a transition away from reliance on synthetic chemical pesticides in agriculture. Drawing on mixed-methods qualitative research, SPRINT researchers identify the key dimensions surrounding these lock-ins and barriers. Take a more detail look of the factsheet via here.

Summary:

These documents highlight that progress towards reduced reliance and dependence on synthetic pesticides is hindered by an ongoing pesticide lock-in situation.

There are many interrelated processes and direct barriers that mutually reinforce each other to limit or substantially slow down a wider transition away from a reliance on chemical pesticides. We have identified the key lock-in mechanisms and barriers across different dimensions including: agronomy and research, economics, knowledge, policy, regulation and cognition.

While specific barriers may vary, many apply across different farming systems. The interaction of these mechanisms and barriers creates a complex situation. For example, the absence or high cost of biocontrol limits openness to non-chemical alternatives, while farmers have already invested substantial resources in mechanised pesticide applications.

Furthermore, authorities rely on emergency authorisations, rather than considering alternatives like growing other crops or the redesign of farming systems due to the cost and effort involved.