What is behind land use change in tropical forests? From local relations to global mining concessions

Summary

The global population depends on mineral and agricultural products sourced from tropical forests, driving land use changes with widespread impacts to biodiversity, food-security, and forest integrity. Land use change is thus the result of decisions taken by farmers, collectives, and institutions with different cultural backgrounds who are influenced by social and market relations at local and global scales. As a result, multiple (often contested) worldviews shape the fate of tropical forests. Although the ultimate decision-makers on land use change are typically farmers from both Indigenous and non-Indigenous (Mestizos) background, we know very little about how the nature of multi-level social relations shapes the land use preferences of farmers from different cultural identities. Drawing from qualitative and quantitative data collected through ethnography and 321 interviews in the Amazon and Andean Choco in Ecuador, we found that large-and small-scale farmers’ land use decisions are shaped by social relations with ancestors and neighbors, markets and powerful mining companies. The importance attributed to those individuals and collectives who shape farmers’ land use preferences is often linked with group identity. Our data, collected and analyzed using mixed methods, show that parents and ancestors are important in the transmission of knowledge, prestigious neighbors are sources of inspiration, and Mestizos serve as role models for some Indigenous farmers. Mestizos report more self-reliance in their decision-making, whereas Indigenous identify government support as having a stronger influence on their land use decisions. Overall, guided by their most important reference groups, Indigenous practice smaller-scale and more diverse agriculture than Mestizos. Women, regardless of ethnicity, commonly keep the practice of crop rotation and count more on their ancestors for land use advice, while deforesting less than men. Finally, global market dynamics and mining companies active in the Amazon and Andean Choco, often supported by the government, exert strong influence over farmers’ land use decisions, moving them away from preferences grounded in local relations towards more extensive and less diverse land use practices. However, some Mestizo and Indigenous farmers’ collectives are prominent actors in the mining resistance, actively fighting to protect tropical forests. This research proposes a novel theoretical and methodological approach to understanding land use change from a relational perspective, in culturally diverse territories often targeted by multiple institutional interventions.